|
Life Sciences and New Methods of Energy Production
Theme leaders: | O.V. Belov E.M. Syresin |
Participating countries and international organizations:
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Mexico, Moldova, Russia, South Africa, Uzbekistan.
The problem under study and the main purpose of the research:
Obtaining applied research and technology results within the areas ARIADNA collaborations' activity, including life sciences, biomedical technologies, space research, radiation materials science, radiation hardeness of electronics, development of new technologies for ADS using NICA beams.
Project in the theme:
Name of the Project | Projects Leaders | Project Code |
||
Laboratory | Responsible from laboratories Status | |||
1. | ADSR Accelerator driven subcritical reactor |
S.I. Tyutyunnikov M. Paraipan |
07-1-1107-1-2011/2027
|
|
VBLHEP, FLNP, DLNP, FLNR, BLTB, LRB |
see list of activities |
The project is aimed to determine the optimum beam-converter combination meant to optimize the efficiency of an accelerator driven subcritical reactor. The planned research will be oriented in two directions. The first involves the comparative study of the fission distribution and the energy released in enriched fuel blanket, irradiated with proton beams with energy 0.2-2 GeV and ion beams with masses until 20Ne and energies in the interval 0.2 -1 AGeV. The second consists in measurements of the neutron yield from various converters, irradiated with proton and ion beams.
A possibility to realize a nuclear system with increased burning capabilities is to use an accelerator driven subcritical reactor (ADSR). It consists of a particle accelerator coupled with a nuclear reactor. The particle beam striking a converter placed in the central part of the reactor realizes a supplementary source of neutrons which allows the functioning of the reactor in subcritical regime (with criticality coefficient keff below 0.99), ensuring a safer exploitation of nuclear plants. The harder neutron spectrum obtained ensures a better incineration of the actinides.
In spite of the almost generalized opinion that the optimal beam for ADS is a proton beam with energy around 1–1.5 GeV we have shown in a series of works that ion beams have a superior energetic efficiency than protons. The activities within the project are oriented towards searching the conditions which maximize the energy efficiency of ADSR and ensure high burnup. Within the previous years, aspects related with the core geometry, the material used for the converter, the fuel composition, the working value of keff, the enrichment and power density distribution were investigated. The influence of the beam characteristics (particle type, energy, beam intensity), and of the accelerator type were also studied. The main conclusions obtained constitute the bases for extending the project in accordance with the stated objectives.
The proposed graphite target “GAMMA4” with fuel rods inserted inside and a central hole for the placement of different converters allows a correct comparison between the number of fissions and the energy released realized with proton and ion beams. The use of a graphite block instead of Pb gives the possibility to diminish the necessary amount of fissile material due to the softer neutron spectrum. Such target is easier to manipulate (due to its lower weight) and cheaper. The proposed graphite target "GAMMA4" is suitable for a comparative study of the efficiency of various beams in terms of the possibility of their use in ADS.
Expected results upon completion of the project:
Selection of an optimal design of a target of the ADS.
Verification of a principally new concept of a system based on the use of ion beams instead of protons.
Implementation of the first stage of experimental programme focused on measurement ofneutron yields with different converter combinations.
Expected results of the project this year:
The realization of technical project for the lead target (block with dimensions of 110x110x150 cm, with central hole for the converters and vertical and horizontal holes for the placement of the fission detectors).
The design of the system for the measurement of the beam intensity (ionization chamber and two plastic scintillators for the absolute calibration of the ionization chamber).
The analysis of the experimental method and the determination of the maximal beam intensities depending on the radiation shielding of the experimental room.
Name of the activity | Leaders | ||||
Laboratory Responsible from laboratories | Status | ||||
1. | R&D within the research topics of the ARIADNA collaborations: experiments in space research, life sciences, biomedical technologies, materials sciences and structure of matter, radiation hardening of electronics and advanced nuclear physics technologies |
O.V. Belov S.I. Tyutyunnikov |
|
||
VBLHEP | V.A. Artyukh, K.P. Afanasyeva, S. Ceballos, V. Dzhavadova, Yu.S. Kovalev, I.A. Kryachko, I.I. Maryin, Yu.A. Murin, M.S. Novikov, A.N. Osipov, N.E. Pukhaeva, A. Rodriguez, A.V. Rogachev, Z. Sadygov, A.A. Slivin, V.N. Shalyapin, G.I. Smirnov, E.M. Syresin, V.B. Dunin, V.A. Pavliukevich, S.E. Sinelshikova |
||||
DLNP | A.V. Agapov, K.V. Belokopytova, A.G. Molokanov, G.V. Mitsyn, A.V. Rzyanina, V.I. Stegailov, S.V. Shvidkiy | ||||
FLNR | P.Yu. Apel, A.N. Nechaev |
||||
FLNP | M.V. Bulavin | ||||
BLTP | V.A. Osipov | ||||
Brief annotation and scientific rationale: Expected results upon completion of the activity: Expected results of the activity this year: - perform R&D on the development of analytical devices used for collecting experimental data from biological objects and materials exposed to ionizing radiation. |
|||||
2. | R&D on optimization of methods for irradiating samples of various types; development of the supporting equipment for ARIADNA target stations. Development of laboratory areas for deployment of the user equipment |
O.V. Belov |
|
||
VBLHEP | M.S. Novikov, E.S. Matyukhanov, A.V. Shemchuk, V.B. Dunin, V.A. Pavliukevich, S.E. Sinelshikovak |
||||
DLNP | A.V. Agapov, K.V. Belokopytov, G.V. Mitsyn, A.G. Molokanov |
||||
Brief annotation and scientific rationale: Expected results upon completion of the activity: Expected results of the activity this year: |
|||||
3. | Upgrade of spectrum-analitical complex for activation measurements |
V.N. Shalyapin |
|
||
VBLHEP | D.R. Drnoyan, I.A. Kryachko, E.V. Strekalovskaya, Toan Tran Ngor |
||||
DLNP | V.I. Stegaylov | ||||
Brief annotation and scientific rationale: Expected results upon completion of the activity: Expected results of the activity this year: |
|||||
4. | Software development and dosimetric calculations for ARIADNA experiments. Simulation of radiation conditions at the NICA complex |
M. Paraipan |
|
VBLHEP | O.V. Belov, T. Chan Ngoc, V. Javadova, M. Paraipan, A.A. Slivin |
||||
LRB | A.V. Chizhov |
||||
Brief annotation and scientific rationale: Expected results upon completion of the activity: Expected results of the activity this year: |
|||||
5. | Study of the radiation effects and superconducting properties of 2nd generation HTSC tapes. Development of magnetic and cryogenic HTSC systems for experimental facilities | M.S. Novikov S.I. Tyutyunnikov |
|
||
VBLHEP | Yu.P. Filippov, E.S. Matyukhanov, M.S. Novikov, A.V. Shemchuk |
||||
FLNP | A.N. Chernikov |
||||
Brief annotation and scientific rationale: Expected results upon completion of the activity: Expected results of the activity this year: |
|||||
6. | Organization and maintenance of the user program ARIADNA. Development of ARIADNA collaborations |
O.V. Belov |
2024-2026
|
||
VBLHEP | M.S. Novikov, M. Paraipan, Yu.A. Tsaplina, S.I. Tyutyunnikov |
||||
Brief annotation and scientific rationale: Expected results upon completion of the activity: Expected results of the activity this year: |
Country or International Organization | City | Institute or laboratory |
Armenia | Yerevan | CANDLE |
Foundation ANSL | ||
YSU | ||
Azerbaijan | Baku | AMU |
Belarus | Minsk | BSU |
INP BSU | ||
JIPNR-Sosny NASB | ||
Bulgaria | Plovdiv | MUP |
Mexico | Mexico City | INCan |
Moldova | Chisinau | MSU |
Russia | Dolgoprudny | MIPT |
Dubna | IAS "Omega" | |
IPTP | ||
MSU Branch | ||
Moscow | "Kvant-R" | |
FMBC | ||
IBMP RAS | ||
ICP RAS | ||
IGIC RAS | ||
ITEP | ||
JIHT RAS | ||
NNRU "MEPhI" | ||
PFUR | ||
SINP MSU | ||
Obninsk | NMRRC | |
Puschino | ITEB RAS | |
Saint Petersburg | SPbSU | |
Tomsk | TPU | |
Vladikavkaz | NOSU | |
South Africa | Somerset West | iThemba LABS |
Stellenbosch | SU | |
Uzbekistan | Tashkent | INP AS RUz |